Rabu, 18 Juni 2025

ANALYZING POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN “DJANGO UNCHAINED” MOVIE


ANALYZING POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN “DJANGO UNCHAINED” MOVIE

Rozan Ibnu Muammar Tifa
(ibnurozan@gmail.com)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract

   This mini research analyzed the characters from Django Unchained movie in using politeness strategies. There is a research questions proposed by the researchers as follows: Which politeness strategies are most used by some character of Django Unchained movie?

    In conducting this mini research, the theory from Brown and Levinson (1987) was used the main theory to analyze and classify the utterance produced by the some character in Django Unchained movie. For analyzing the factors which influence the choice of politeness startegies, the researchers also used the same theory from Brown and Levinson (1987). The researchers used qualitative research by applying content analysis method in conducting the research. The script was used by the reseracher as the source in analyzing the utterances produced by the characters in Django Unchained movie.

    In conclusion, the results of this mini research showed that the characters used all of four politeness strategies. The most common strategies were negative politeness and off record, where positive politeness and bald on record were the least strategies used by the characters in this movie.

Keywords : Django Unchained Movie, politeness strategies, face threatening act, sociological variables, payoffs.

......................................................................................................................................................................


INTRODUCTION

        Communication is one of the most important aspects in our daily lives. People share ideas, feelings, evaluations, and many things using language. Hence, language is perceived as a communication tool among speakers and hearers. In order to convey meanings, people may use both spoken and unspoken forms. Utterances, gestures, and sign languages may become alternatives how speakers convey meanings through language. However, utterance is the most effective way for speakers to convey meanings since not all hearers are able to interpret sign languages and gestures accurately.

        The ways speakers convey utterances as well as meanings will certainly differ from one another. Education background, ethnicity, age, power, gender, context, and many other aspects may influence the ways of speaking. Indeed, various social situations the speakers and the hearers possess may influence the speakers’ utterances.

      Speakers should be able to choose appropriate language choice, in which the meanings will be successfully delivered and to choose appropriate ways to do so. For instance, speaking to a boss who has more relative power using performative sentence, such as “Do this!” may be considered rude. Another utterance when a friend is asking for opinion about her outfit and the hearer simply answers: “Red. Not your color. It’s too flashy.” will be considered appropriate if the parties involved have known each other well. In conclusion, it is obvious for speakers to adjust their languages to fit the situations. Inappropriate language choices may cause problems since the hearers are being insulted by the speakers. Thus, appropriate language choice is closely related to politeness.

         In accordance with the issue and the significance of politeness elaborated in the case above, the study on politeness is worthy-analyzed as it provides benefits for English language learning. It provides politeness theory as well as the examples as a learning source for learners who are eager to learn sociolinguistics, principally politeness. Therefore, the writer is interested in investigating politeness phenomenon as it does not only deal with a matter of using certain expressions, such as “sorry” in the right place. In fact, using certain politeness strategy may depend on several factors. As a result, it is important for the writer to understand politeness factors as well.

      As a result, those politeness phenomenon led the writers into a complete understanding in classifying utterances concerning politeness for analyzing the factors which influence the choice of politeness strategies and find the factors influenced in choosing the politeness strategies which are payoffs and social variables.

       This study focused on analyzing Django Unchained movie. In analyzing the movie, Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness was used as the basis theory as it provided sufficient information on politeness phenomenon. As a result, all main characters utterances concerning politeness were categorized into four politeness strategies as Brown and Levinson (1987) suggested. Based on the description above, researchers interest did a research about politeness in Django Unchained Movie. The researchers do a research entitled “Analyzing Politeness Strategies in Django Unchained Movie”

      In conducting this study, the writer formulate research problems dealing with politeness. The problem focuses on the politeness strategies applied in the subject of the study. In brief, this research problems are formulated as follows : Which politeness strategies are most used by the characters of Django Unchained movie? From the explanation above, The Objectives of this Research is to analyze the politeness strategies contained in the Django Unchained Movie.

      The writers presents two major parts namely, sociolinguistics and politeness. Sociolinguistics is presented in order to figure out the topic discussed. Moreover, politeness, as the basis theory, is used to discuss Django Unchained movie. Spolsky (2004) defines sociolinguistics as “a field that studies the relation between language and society (p. 3).” It provides evidence and researches about various human languages in the society. It also explains why speakers say the same thing in different ways. Holmes (2001) emphasizes “language provides a variety ways of saying the same thing (p. 3).” Varieties may occur due to various factors, such as age, gender, relation, social class, ethnicity, and context. In brief, sociolinguistics primarily focuses on the study of language use. Utterances do not only provide information as the literal meanings, but also clues to nonlinguistic information. An utterance, for instance, can indicate the society or community in which a speaker coming from. Thus, in order to convey meaning successfully, the speaker of a language should be able to apply the sociolinguistics competence to produce appropriate language.

       Based on Leech’s point of view, politeness may function as a way of controlling potential threats between speakers and hearers. It is even more similar to politeness definition proposed by (Brown and Levinson, 1987) in (Konrad, et al., 2005). “Politeness is rational behavior aimed at the strategic softening (or mitigation) of face-threatening acts.” Politeness, however, has little to do with good manners, such as saying “Please” or “Sorry”. As a conclusion, being linguistically polite simply means paying attention to others’ feelings.

       Brown and Levinson divide face into two notions, namely positive and negative faces. Brown and Levinson (1987) define positive face as “public self-image that a person wants for himself.” Positive face covers one’s desire to be liked, admired, and approved positively by others in their community. It, sometimes, refers to self-esteem. On the other hand, according to Brown and Levinson (1987), negative face is “the want of every ‘competent adult member’ that his actions be unimpeded by others” or “the basic claim to territories, personal preserves, rights to non-distraction. The freedom of action and freedom from imposition.” It simply refers to one’s freedom to act.

     Brown and Levinson (1987) suggest that everyone has two types of face: negative and positive faces. When people communicate and interact with others, speakers and hearers want to maintain their positive face as well as the negative one. On the other hand, sometimes faces cannot be simply maintained as what one interactional party wants. The speakers and hearers’ faces are usually threatened by one another to varying degrees. As a result, the speakers and the hearers do an act that damages the face of others in opposition to their face-saving and desire. This act is called Face Threatening Acts (FTAs). Brown and Levinson (1987) define FTAs as “acts run contrary to the face wants of the hearers and/or the speaker.” FTAs are usually done within verbal communication, through utterances for instance. However, tone, intonation, andother non-verbal communication can also cause FTAs as well.

     Brown and Levinson (1987) propose four politeness strategies to minimize the possibility of face-damaged, namely Bald-On Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off-Record. Speakers can choose one of those four politeness strategies when they want to do the FTAs in which the degree may vary. The more speakers want to use “highernumbered” strategy, the more polite it is. The elaborations of each strategy as well as the examples are presented as follows.

 a).          Bald-On Record Strategy

   According to Brown and Levinson (1987), Bald-On Record strategy is “a direct way of saying things.” It does not lead hearers to misunderstanding and misinterpretation. The utterances are spoken in a direct, clear, unambiguous, and concise way. This strategy is applied without any minimization to the impositions to the hearers. Further, Brown and Levinson states that this strategy have many category such as emergency; task oriented, request, and alerting. Emergency in that urgent condition this strategy conversation often using by speaker and interlocutors, as example ‘’Hey, watch out!’’. Task oriented is conversation strategy when what is mean by speaker to follow interlocutors, example ‘’turn the TV off!” Request is strategy for extend interlocutors urge immediately way. Example ‘’lend me your duty!’’. Alerting is strategy category bald and record used by speaker to give warning or sentence alert to interlocutors, example is ‘’Beware! Don’t drink while walking.

 b).          Positive Politeness Strategy

  Positive politeness is strategy politeness used by speaker and interlocutors, and they who are close and familiar to us. The sentence used is usually a friendly language. This strategy has too much strategy there are attend to the hearer, avoid disagreement, assume disagreement, and hedge opinion. Attend to the hearer used when speaker want to be more friendly with interlocutors. The sentence which is spoken make listener or interlocutors feel comfortable or respected. Avoid disagreement be used when they want avoid debate because has dissent with interlocutors. Assume agreement is strategy be used for achievement and draw conclusion that interlocutors agreed with speaker. Hedge opinion is where speaker objective adjust from conversation to give suggestion interlocutors to avoid interlocutors from feel uncomfortable and offended.

 c).          Negative Politeness Strategy

    Negative Politeness is the acts that directly for the hearer with indicate the speaker doesn’t intend to avoid impeding hearer freedom of action, for example: orders, requests, suggestion, offers, promises, compliments, etc. Negative politeness strategies are oriented towards the hearer's negative face and emphasize avoidance of imposition on the hearer. By attempting to avoid imposition from the speaker, the risk of face-threat to the hearer is reduced. These strategies presume that the speaker will be imposing on the listener and there is a higher potential for awkwardness or embarrassment than in bald on record strategies and positive politeness strategies.

There are two kinds of another threatening act may happened to the speaker : Offend speaker negative face and Directly damage speaker positive face.

·   Offend speaker negative face such as expressing thanks, acceptance of hearer thanks, acceptance of hearer apology, acceptance of offers, response to hearer faux pas, unwilling promises and offers.

·    In other hand, directly damage speaker positive face such as apologies, acceptance of compliments, break down of physical control body, self-humiliation, confessions, and emotion leakage.

 d).          Off Record Strategy

      The final politeness strategy outlined by Brown and Levinson is the indirect strategy; This strategy uses indirect language and removes the speaker from the potential to be imposing. The strategy of doing off-record to express something general or different than the speaker’s true meaning and relies on the hearer's interpretation to have the speaker's purpose get conveyed. You are removing yourself from any imposition whatsoever. The speaker can get credit for not imposing on the hearer or give the hearer a chance to be helpful and generous. This strategy relies heavily on pragmatics to convey the intended meaning while still utilizing the semantic meaning as a way to avoid losing face.

     The director of this film is Quentin Tarantino, who made Pulp Fiction in 1994 and was excited because it contained a lot of swear words in it. Not only that, Quentin Tarantino is also famous for his bloody scenes in his films. So don't be surprised if in the early minutes the bloody blood scene has appeared convincingly. Django Unchained is divided into two story sessions. The first story is about a German named Dentist King Schultz who hunts fugitives and the second story is about Django's efforts to save his wife. The film with a fairly long duration of 165 minutes is enough to show the atmosphere of slavery which is identical to black or negro.

       Two years before the Civil War, Django (Jamie Foxx), a slave, finds himself accompanying an unorthodox German bounty hunter named Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz) on a mission to capture the vicious Brittle brothers. Their mission successful, Schultz frees Django, and together they hunt the South's most-wanted criminals. Their travels take them to the infamous plantation of shady Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio), where Django's long-lost wife (Kerry Washington) is still a slave.

         Quentin Tarantino presents a different cowboy atmosphere in general. Many shooting scenes with bullets scattering here and there are presented in this film. Blood and blood spurting complete the awesomeness of this film as well as become the hallmark of the director. Country songs as a characteristic of cowboys are quite pleasant to hear, but don't be surprised if there are also rap songs in this film. The comedy element is also there as a complement so you don't get bored when watching for a long duration. This film is worth watching for adults.

         The study particularly aims at analyzing the use of politeness strategies in the utterances produced by the two main characters of Django Unchained movie and the factors affecting the choice of politeness strategies. The writer summaries and synthesizes all theories related to the study to answer the two formulated research questions. In order to analyze the use of politeness strategy in Django Unchained Movie, politeness theories as well as sociolinguistics have been presented previously.

        This study presents politeness strategies proposed by (Brown and Levinson, 1987) to answer the first research problem; “What are Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies used by some characters of the Django Unchained movie?” Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory is used as the basis theory as it provides politeness strategies classification and detailed explanation of each strategy. The writer, as a result, classifies the characters’ utterances of Django Unchained movie into four politeness strategies as (Brown and Levinson, 1987) proposed. Those are Bald-On Record Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off-Record.

......................................................................................................................................................................

RESEARCH METHOD

            Content Analysis was used as the research method. Documents as a source of data may take a variety of forms. The documents can be either printed materials, such as textbook, newspaper, magazine, script, or recorded materials, such as movie, documentary film, and any other types of recordings. Content analysis is a qualitative approach whose focus was qualitative data, such as words and pictures rather than numbers. Further, Ary, Jacobs, and Sorensen (2010) mentioned that Content analysis study is conducted to learn about human behavior. Thus, some characters of Django Unchained movie’s utterances were analyzed and interpreted descriptively to learn about human behavior, primarily speaking politely.

            This study employed purposive sampling as the method of sampling. Babbie (1990: 97) as cited in Latham (2007) define purposive sampling as selecting a sample on the basis of your own knowledge of the population, its elements, and the nature of your research aims. In this study, the writer took a movie and a movie script entitled Django Unchained as the data source.

         The writer analyzed the Django Unchained movie script as well as the movie. All utterances produced by some characters related to speaking politeness were collected as the source of data. Afterwards, those utterances were identified in order to find out which utterances applied a certain politeness strategy. Besides, how the characters uttered the utterances should become a consideration as well. Furthermore, the writer categorized each utterance concerning politeness into four politeness strategies as Brown and Levinson (1987) proposed. In conducting the study, the writer took some steps. They were (1) collecting references and data, (2) categorizing the data, (3) analyzing the data, and (4) writing up a report.

            The main focus of this study was the use of Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies in a movie. Therefore, selecting a movie containing a lot of politeness strategies was necessary to do. As Django Unchained movie tells us about racism history, sarcasm and violence, utterances related to politeness strategies are commonly used in the dialogues, specifically Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, Bald-On Record and off record. There were two instruments used in the study : the researcher as human instrument and Django Unchained movie script as the document.

......................................................................................................................................................................


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

            This chapter presents the research findings of the study. It discusses the research results and interprets them concerning the two formulated research questions. The research question is about Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies applied by the characters of the Django Unchained movie.

            Almost all characters of Django Unchained movie employed all four Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies. Those were Bald-On Record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness, and Off-Record. The characters utterances concerning politeness were all analyzed based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness (1987). The following list presents the politeness strategies of Django Unchained movie.

1.     Bald-On Record Strategies in Django Unchained Movie

     (Brown and Levinson, 1987) mention that a speaker who applies a Bald-On Record strategy is likely to shock and to embarrass hearers. This strategy is a direct way of saying things. It does not attempt to minimize the threats to the hearers’ notions of face. It is commonly employed in a situation whereby both interactional parties involved have close relationships, such as family, close friend, or colleague. Furthermore, it is employed when the speaker wants to show great urgency, alert, efficiency, and impositions. Besides, it is also frequently applied in task-oriented utterance, welcome, and offer.

Bald-On Record strategy was applied by the characters of Django Unchained movie who have good relationships such as Dr.King Schultz, Django, and Broomhilda. Especially for Dr. King Schultz and Django obviously applied this strategy as they had close relationships with many other characters in this movie. Besides, the movie mostly revolved around their routines at works and partnerships.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 1          

     First, we analyzed Django Unchained movie from scene 2 when Django and Dr. King Schultz enter a saloon.

Dr. Schultz         : (returns inside) Alas, now we must act as our own bartender. Sit down my boy.

Django                : What kinda dentist are you?

Dr. Schultz         : (Laughs) Despite that cart I have not practiced dentistry in five years. But these days I practice a new profession: bounty hunter.

Dr. Schultz         : Do you know what a bounty hunter is?

Django                : No.

Dr. Schultz        : Well, the way the slave trade deals in human lives for cash, a bounty hunter deals in corpses. (Clicks his tongue to signal Django to get his hat off the table)

Analysis

     From the dialogue, it can be seen that Django and Dr. King Schultz has a pretty good relationship, with evidence of dialogue “Dr. Schultz       : Alas, now we must act as our own bartender. Sit down my boy.”  At the the movie, Dr. King Schultz was a dentist who become bounty hunter, while Django was a slave before Dr. King Schultz bought him. Django position allowed him to apply Bald-On Record commonly to his master, whereas as a master Dr. King Schultz applied Bald-On Record frequently towards his partner Django in the movie just like a son. Dr. Schultz in this scene offer Django a glass of beer and sit together for talks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 2

     In the next scene, we analyzed the dialogue between Broom Hilda and Dr.Schultz in Mr. Candies Estate.

Dr.Schultz          : They call you Hildi, but your real name is Broomhilda, isn't it?

Broomhilda        : Yes. How do you know that?

Dr. Schultz       : Stands to reason who ever taught you German would also give you a German name. Can I pour you a glass of water, Broomhilda?

Dr. Schultz         : Please drink.

Analysis

     In the dialogue above, we can analyze that Dr. King Schultz who had just met Broomhilda but had already shown intimacy and a close relationship. In this scene we can see that Dr. King Schultz shows a deeper bald on record politeness strategy. Dr.Schultz offer Broomhilda a drink “Stands to reason who ever taught you German would also give you a German name. Can I pour you a glass of water, Broomhilda?” and have a nice talk.

     From the dialogues above, the number of Bald-On Record strategy employed by Django, Dr.King Schultz and Broomhilda in Django Unchained It is mostly applied by the characters in a situation when great urgency, task-oriented, and no threat minimizing occurred.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

2.   Positive Politeness Strategies in Django Unchained Movie

       Brown and Levinson (1987) define Positive Politeness as a strategy which is oriented towards the face saving or the positive self-image of hearers. It satisfies the hearers’ notions of positive face. As a result, it promotes solidarity and friendship between the two parties involved. Compliment, optimism, agreement, and joke are some examples of Positive Politeness strategy. Besides, it also puts positive values on the hearers’ appearances, works, ideas, and other aspects. Bride Wars movie figured out stories about friendship which turned out to be rivalry. Positive Politeness strategy, thus, were frequently applied in the movie script.

In this film there are several positive politeness strategies because the film focuses on the era when slave trading took place in the United States before the civil war.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 1

Django             : What'd ya mean partner up?

Dr.Schultz        : You be my deputy, for real this time. A lot of the big money is in outlaw gangs. Some of these fellas are worth fifteen hundred or three thousand a piece. With one man, anything over three men is a risk. But with a partner? Creating cross fire? It's fish in a. barrel. A lot of these gangs hold up in the'hill for the winter.

Django              : You makin' another agreement?

Dr. Schultz       : Yes. You work with me through the winter, the snow melts. I give you a third my bounties. And while we're together,  I'll teach you a few things you're going to need to know.

Django              : Can you teach me how to make Tony do that head bow thing that Fritz can do?

Dr. Schultz       : That among other things. We make some money this winter, when the snow melts, I'll take you to Greenville myself, and we'll find where they sent your wife. I'm pretty good at finding people. Is it a deal? No white man has ever done anything for Django, just to him. So understandably, he's a little suspicious.

Analysis

          From dialogue 1, Dr.Schultz applied Positive Politeness strategy by conveying an agreement. Dr. Schultz initially made an offer for Django to join as a bounty hunter. Dr. Schultz offers Django to hunt down three of the gang's most wanted members and the proceeds from the bounty will go to Django and with the income from the three gang members, Dr. Schultz. Schultz will teach Django things he doesn't know and then after that Dr. Schultz will take Django to Greenville to find his missing wife Django. After talking, Django finally agreed to the deal.

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 2

Sheriff               : (to Django and Dr. Schultz) Now, why ya’ll want to come into my town and start trouble? And scare all these nice people? You ain’t got nothing better to do than to come to Bill Sharp’s town (Dr. Schultz approaches the sheriff as he speaks) and show your as*?

Marshal             : You in the saloon! We got a hundred rifles aimed at every way out of that building. You got one chance to get out of this alive. You and your nigg*r come out right now with your hands over your head and I mean right now.

Dr. Schultz       : (inside of the saloon) Is this the marshal I have the pleasure of addressing?

The Marshal    : Yes it is. This is U.S. Marshal Gill Tatum.

Dr. Schultz       : Na wunderbar, marshal! I have relieved myself of all weapons. And just as you have instructed I’m ready to step outside with my hands raised above my head. I trust as a representative of the criminal justice system of the United States of America, I shan’t be shot down in the street by either you or your deputies before I’ve had my day in court.

The Marshal    : You mean like did our sheriff? Shot him down like a dog in the street.

Dr. Schultz       : Yes, that’s exactly what I mean! Do I have your word as a lawman not to shoot me down like a dog in the street?

The Marshal    : Well, much as we’d all enjoy seeing something like that, ain’t nobody gonna cheat the hangman in my town.

Dr. Schultz       : Fair enough, marshal! Here we come!

Analysis

          From dialogue 2, Dr.Schultz and The Marshall also applied Positive Politeness strategy by conveying an agreement or negotiations. After the Beer Drinking Scene, Dr. Schultz and Django have an encounter, first with a sheriff and then with the marshal. As the sheriff brings them outside in front of the townsfolk to question them with an arrogant attitude Dr. Schultz approaches him and shoots him dead in front of everyone. Once again this action occurs very suddenly and seems completely irrational and rushed. Django seems very shocked and worried about the turn of the events, however Dr. Schultz does not seem fazed at all as he tells the innkeeper to go get the marshal. Later it becomes clear why Dr. Schultz requested the sheriff first and marshal after.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 3

Dr. Schultz       : So, I would like the two of us to enter into an agreement. I’m looking for the Brittle Brothers. However, I heard this endeavor I’m in a slight disadvantage insofar as I don’t know what they look like. But you do, don’t you?  

Analysis

          Dialogue 3 also applied an agreement. Dr. Schultz reveals that he needs Django’s help to recognize some people who are on his wanted list. This revelation brings dimension to Dr. Schultz’s character and his motives. Suddenly his actions are no longer done at random but carefully calculated.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 4  

Dr. Schultz       : Are these Broomhilda’s papers?

Mr. Candie       : Yes, they are.

Dr. Schultz       : May I?

Mr. Candie       : Of course.

Dr. Schultz       : Thank you.

Mr. Candie       : That is her bill of sale, her ownership history and of course her freedom papers, doctor.

Dr. Schultz       : Would you have ink and pen for me?

Mr. Candie       : (points behind him) Right over there on that little table.

Dr. Schultz       : Thank you.

Analysis

       Dialogue 4 show an agreement between Mr. Candie and Dr. Schultz for buying one of candie’s slave. In the final scene where Dr. Schultz appears, they have arrived at a plantation owned by Mr. Calvin Candie, who is a slave owner. Dr. Schultz and Django have killed the Brittle brothers and Dr. Schultz is in the process of buying the freedom of Django's wife Broomhilda, whom they only recently found out to be a slave in the plantation. They are in a sitting room with Mr.Candie, signing Broomhilda’s papers of freedom.

       It can be concluded that in Positive politeness strategy, this film shows more things about agreement and negotiation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 3.   Negative Politeness Strategies in Django Unchained Movie

       Brown and Levinson (1987) mention that Negative Politeness strategy intends to create distance between a speaker and hearers to show respect. It also performs the functions of minimizing particular impositions on the hearers. Formality and indirectness, as a result, are some examples of Negative Politeness strategy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 1

Dr. Schultz            : So, I wish to parley with you.

Speck Brother      : Speak English!

Dr. Schultz            : Oh, I’m sorry. Please forgive me, it is a second language. Now amongst your inventory, I’m led to believe is a specimen I’m keen to acquire

Analysis    

       Dialogoe 1 show directly damage speaker positive face that is emotion leakage and offend negative face for apologies. The Speck brothers get visibly annoyed and they urge Dr. Schultz to “speak English”, by which they mean their variety of English, which features less complex sentence structures , a smaller vocabulary, and is delivered by the actors in a Southern US accent. The accent simultaneously accurately situates them in the correct time and place and also signals to the viewers that these characters are less intelligent, as the southern US accent is treated as inferior in the public's minds). Dr. Schultz speaks more educated English. Dr. Schultz also favours challenging vocabulary, such as “parley”, “purchase” and “ascertain” instead of simply saying that he wants “to do business with you” and “buy” and “make sure”.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 2

Mr. Candie           : One more moment doctor!

Dr. Schultz            : What?

Mr. Candie           : It’s a custom here in the South, once a business deal is concluded that the two parties shook hands. It implies good faith.

Mr. Candie           : Mr. Pooch! If she tries to leave here before this nigg*r-loving German shakes my hand. You cut got her as* down.

Dr. Schultz            : You really want me to shake your hand?

Mr. Candie           : I insist.

Dr. Schultz            : (mockingly) If you insist! (smiles and approaches Mr. Candie and proceeds to shoot him in the chest)

(Mr. Candie falls down dead)

Servant                  : Nooo, Calvin! Calvin!

Dr. Schultz            : (turns to the other men with guns): I’m sorry. I couldn’t resist.

(Dr. Schultz is shot dead by Mr. Pooch. Django shots Mr. Pooch right after that. A gunfight with Django and other characters ensues.)

Analysis    

       From dialogue 2, we can see that Dr.Schultz and Mr. Candie show negative politeness of offend negative face for acceptance of offers and break down of physical control body. Dr. Schultz attempts to leave but Mr. Candie stops him and insists him to shake his hand, provoked by Dr. Schultz's words to him. Dr. Schultz passive- aggressively denies him. After Mr. Candie threatens to shoot Broomhilda Dr. Schultz asks one last time if Mr. Candie wants to shake hands with him. It is as if Dr. Schultz gives Mr.Calvin one more chance to retreat and preserve his life. After Mr. Candie insists, Dr. Schultz once again calmly approaches him and abruptly shoots him dead.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 3

       He also goes down on his own terms and lets nobody tell him what to do. Before he is shot dead and shortly after he has killed Mr. Candie and said :

Dr. Schultz            : “I’m sorry, I couldn’t resist”

Analysis    

       Dialogue 3 happened after Dr.Schultz killed Mr.Candie and he turn his face to Django face and said “I’m sorry, I couldn’t resist” that show offend negative face and directly damage physical control body for apologies. Because, he has knowingly accepted his faith because he feels that he has freed Django and his wife Broomhilda, thus having fulfilled his purpose of being against slavery. Immediately after his shocking demise Django destroys Mr. Candie’s country house and kills everyone on the plantation, apart from the slaves. This can be considered to be Dr. Schultz’s ultimate legacy to Django and his death makes him an even more compelling character. Dr.schultz could not stand Mr. Candie's racism and slavery business and finally shot Mr. Candie. Candie even though Dr.Schultz already knew that his fate would be the same, namely to die too.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 4

Dr. Schultz            : Who are they? (continues calmly)

Django                   : Big John, Ellis, Roger. Sometime they call him Little Rog.

Dr. Schultz            : (Nods)

Django                   : They were…

Dr. Schultz            : Not anymore. Tell me, if you were to see any of these three gentlemen again would you recognize them?

Brother                  : Hey, stop talking to him like that.

Dr. Schultz            : Like what?

Brother                  : (points at them) Like that.

Dr. Schultz            : My good man I’m simply trying to ascertain-

Brother                  : (interrupting) Speak English, goddamnit.

Dr. Schultz            : Everybody, calm down I’m simply a customer trying to conduct a transaction.

Brother                  : I don’t care. No sale. Now off with ya.

Dr. Schultz            : Pfft. Don’t be ridiculous, of course they’re for sale

Brother                  : (Points a gun at Dr. Schultz) Move it.

Dr. Schultz            : My good man. Did you simply get carried away with your dramatic gesture or are you pointing your weapon at me with lethal intention?

Brother                  : (Loads his gun) Last chance, fancypants.

Dr. Schultz            : Oh, very well. (Suddenly drops his lantern and shoots one of the brothers in the head and the other brother’s horse, so he gets trapped under the horse)

Brother                  : (Screams in agony)

Analysis    

       There are more negative politeness strategy in Dialogue 4. The dialogue above show that strategy are offend negative face with showing apologies, response to hearer and disagreement while in directly damage speaker positive face showing compliments, break down of physical control body, and emotion leakage. Dr. Schultz does not appear threatening but the Speck brothers seem cautious and surprised. The ambush starts from the beginning of their dialogue as Dr. Schultz uses very formal English and a broad vocabulary. He adds descriptive adjectives into his speech and greets them with good manners and politeness. Dr. Schultz could use a simpler language, however he does not abandon his sophisticated speaking for one moment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 5

Dicky Speck          : Who’s that stumblin’ around in the dark? State your business or prepare to get winged. (clicking his gun):

Dr. Schultz            : Calm yourselves, gentlemen. I mean you no harm. I’m simply a fellow weary traveler. Whoa!  (with a slight German accent) (Schultz directs this to his horse for them to stop moving).

Dr. Schultz            : Good cold evening, gentlemen. I’m looking for a pair of slave traders that go by the name of “Speck brothers”. Might that be you?

Analysis

       Dialogue 5 showed that offend speaker negative face by apologies, offers, response to hearer, and promises with directly damage speaker positive face by break down body control, emtion leakeage and confessions and a little bit of awkwardness and embarassment. The Speck brothers get frustrated with him having the upper hand in their conversation using complex sentence structures as can be seen on line 2 in the transcript. He usually adds adjectives to his sentences in order to make his speech more descriptive. This also means that he is attentive and actively makes observations about his surroundings. Rather than saying that he is also just travelling around he states; “I’m simply a fellow weary traveller”. This conveys information about him being an intellectual character. Dicky Speck also said “State your business or prepare to get winged.” That showing offend speaker negative face with response to hearer and threating Dr. Schultz.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 6

Mr. Candie           : Dumas...?

Dr. Schultz            : Alexander Dumas. He wrote "The Three Musketeers." I figured you must be an admirer. You named your slave after that novel's lead character. If Alexander Dumas had been there today, I wonder what he would of made of it?

Mr. Candie           : You doubt he’d approve, huh?

Dr. Schultz            : Yes, his approval would be a dubious proposition at best.

Mr. Candie           : Soft-hearted Frenchie?

Dr. Schultz            : Alexander Dumas is black.

Analysis

       This dialogue 6 above showed offend the speaker negative face by embarassment and awkwardness while in directly damage positive face with self-humilation and compliments. With this line, Dr. Schultz simultaneously points out Mr. Candie’s ignorance since Mr. Candie is a very racist character in the film and tests out Mr. Candie’s knowledge by stating that Alexandre Dumas is black. Candie’s reaction reveals that he had no idea about the famous author’s race. It is very unlikely that he would have even read a book from a black author, however, here he has done it unknowingly.

       It can be concluded that in negative politeness strategy, this film shows more things about offend speaker negative and directly damage positive face and negative politeness strategies in this movie are often used by the characters in the movie.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

4.   Off Record Strategies in Django Unchained Movie

          (Brown and Levinson, 1987) mention that a speaker can apply Off-Record strategy by using hint or statement. It allows hearers to interpret the meaning themselves. The statement, as a result, is not directly addressed to the hearers. The speaker can use Off-Record strategy to avoid the responsibility of doing Face Threatening Acts (FTAs). In this movie, there are a lot of racism statement, sarcasm, and joke. The writers analyzed some dialogues with off record strategies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dialogue 1

Dr. Schultz  : ” Now, as to you poor devils.”

Analysis

          Dialogue 1 showed that off record strategies by doing blatant racism and sarcasm. The statement above is expressed by Dr. King Schultz and the place was taken in the forest when he met the two men with Django and other black people. His statement is aimed to the black people without an apology even though he is such a wise man.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 2

Dr. Schultz  : Good cold evening, gentlemen. I’m looking for a pair of slave traders that go by the name of “Speck brothers”. Might that be you?

Analysis

          Dialogue 2 showed off record for giving a hints, we see Dr.Schultz said “Good cold evening……” when Dr.schultz met the speck brother, the weather was very cold and they passed each other in the middle of the forest.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 3

Speck brother           : “Nigg*r, don’t you touch my brother’s coat”

Analysis

          In Dialogue 3 above showed that off record politeness strategies with blatant racism. The statement above is expressed by one of the Speck brothers in the forest as Schultz asks Django to take the dead Speck brother‟s coat to put on. His statement is aimed towards Django. He said nigg*r because Django is a black guy and it is totally blatant of his saying such words without an apology or confusion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 4

Big Daddy    : “ It’s against the law for nigg*rs to ride horses in this territory”.

Analysis

          Dialogue 3 above showed that off record politeness strategies with blatant racist statement. The statement above is expressed by Big Daddy as known as Mr. Bennett. The place was taken in his house when Django and Schultz arrived with their horses. The utterance of Big Daddy showed that he cannot agree with black people riding a horse and he said that without saying sorry or feeling guilty. He blatantly did it. He said that because he did not want to see a black person on a horse at least on his property surrounded by other black people.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 5

Dr. Schultz  : Good morning, innkeeper! Two beers for two weary travelers.

Innkeeper                : (His back to Django and Dr. Schultz) It’s still a bit early. We won’t be open for another hour. By then we’ll be serving breakfast-” (gasps upon seeing Django) Whoa whoa whoa whoa! What the hell you think you’re doing boy? Get that nigg*r out of here!

Dr. Schultz  : (Stares at the keeper incredulously)

(Innkeeper runs out of the saloon) Help! Help! Help!

Analysis

          Still, in dialogue 5, strategies for off record politeness with blatant racicm and sarcasm in it. The inkeeper said “(gasping) Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa … what the hell you think you’re doing, boy? Get that nigg*r outta here!” The statement is expressed by the innkeeper when Dr. Schultz and Django enter the saloon for two glasses of beer. The statement was aimed towards Schultz to get Django, the black guy, out of the salon. This expression is rude and he said that without any guilty feeling. It is clearly that the innkeeper does not let black people to be inside his salon because black people do not deserve to be treated nice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 6

Dr. Schultz              : Oh, maybe while we discuss business, you could provide one of your loveliest black creatures to escort Django here around your magnificent grounds.

Mr. Bennet             : Oh, well absolutely! Uh, Betina sugar? Betina : Yessir, Big Daddy?

Mr. Bennet              : Could you take Django around Betina : Yes’m?

Mr. Bennet              : Django isn’t a slave. Django is a free man, you understand? You can’t treat him like any of the other nigg*rs around here cause he ain’t like any of the other nigg*rs around here. You got it?

Betina                      : You want I should treat him like white folks?

Mr. Bennet             : No, that’s not what I said.

Betina                      : Then I don’t know what you want, Big Daddy.

Mr. Bennet : Yes, I can see that. Uh..( turn aside and hand gestures at a black woman behind him) What’s the name of the peckerwood boy from town that works with the glass? His mama work over at the lumberyard.

Black woman          : Oh you mean Jerry?

Mr. Bennet              : That’s the boy’s name. Jerry! You know Jerry, don’t you sugar?

Betina                      : Yes’m, Big Daddy.

Mr. Bennet             : Well that’s it then. You just treat him like you would Jerry.

Analysis

          Dialogue 6 showed off record strategis with unintentional racism. The dialog above occurs between Mr. Bennet and Betina as Betina is about to take Django around to see all the pretty stuffs when Schultz reminds Mr. Bennet that Django is a free man. He cannot be treated like a slave and must be treated as an extension of Schultz. Schultz seems to be nice but Mr. Bennet is nice just because Schultz does not want him to treat Django like a slave. And when Betina asks him about treating him like white people, Mr. Bennet says that it is not what he said. Betina should treat Django like a renowned person but still a black person.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogue 7

Dr. Schultz              : (inside of the saloon) Is this the marshal I have the pleasure of addressing?

The Marshal           : Yes it is. This is U.S. Marshal Gill Tatum.

Dr. Schultz            : Na wunderbar, marshal! I have relieved myself of all weapons. And just as you have instructed I’m ready to step outside with my hands raised above my head. I trust as a representative of the criminal justice system of the United States of America, I shan’t be shot down in the street by either you or your deputies before I’ve had my day in court.

The Marshal           : You mean like did our sheriff? Shot him down like a dog in the street.

Dr. Schultz            : Yes, that’s exactly what I mean! Do I have your word as a lawman not to shoot me down like a dog in the street?

Analysis

          Dialogue 7 showing off record politeness with Joke and Sarcasm. Dr. Schultz just shot dead a criminal who disguised himself as the sheriff of the city like a dog on the streets. Then when Marshall arrived at the scene, Dr. Schults negotiated not to be shot as he himself did to the fake sheriff. Dr. Schultz has a strong natural authority which he uses in this scene. He is a charismatic speaker who knows his business well and easily maintains the audience’s attention. He is knowledgeable of the US justice system and uses that to ascertain his own safety. He instructs Django to let him do the talking and the way he routinely instructs Django gives the idea that he is used to these kinds of situations. Django does not try to question his actions to his face.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          In conclusion, it can be seen that this film often uses off record strategies and is very dominant in this film.

          Django Unchained is a movie that shows a lot of racist actions which also clearly shows that black people are lower than white ones. There are some actions or scenes that we can divide them into three types of racism, blatant, covert, and unintentional racism in off record. Also there are politeness strategy used by the characters in this movie.

          From the results, that the characters in this film often use politeness strategies with negative politeness and off record politeness which is very dominating in this film. 

......................................................................................................................................................................


CONCLUSION

          Politeness is a system of interpersonal relations designed to facilitate interaction by minimizing the potential for conflict and confrontation inherent in all human interchange. According to Goffman (1967) stated that about Negative and positive face, Negative face is the need to be independent to have a freedom of action and not to be imposed by others. Positive face is the need to be accepted, even liked by others, to be treated as a member of the group and to know that his or her wants are shared by others. In conclusion, we can say that negative politeness is the need to be independent and positive politeness is the need to be connected. According to the data analysis, the researcher has found that there are four politeness strategies such as bald on record, positive politeness, negative politeness. And off record in “Django Unchained Movie”.

            In Django Unchained, a movie directed by Quentin Tarantino is indeed talking about racism. The research revealed that Dr. Schultz as supporting actor is dominant for showing all politeness strategies such as his calm, charismatic and collective demeanor. Unlike the main character, Django, who doesn't talk much in this movie, he showed politeness strategies that are dominant to bald on record and positive politeness. For Mr.Candie, we analyzed that Mr.Candie often using negative politeness and off record because he is the most racist man in this movie and really ignorance. Same like Mr. Candie, Mr. Bennet (Big Daddy), and Speck brother also dominant in negative politeness and off record strategies.  

            In conclusion, the results of this research showed that the characters in Django Unchained movie used all of four politeness strategies. The most common strategies were negative politeness and off record, where positive politeness and bald on record were the least strategies used by the characters in this movie.

......................................................................................................................................................................


REFERENCES

Ary, D. Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.


Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.


Django Unchained Movie BluRay by Quentin Tarantino Edelstein, D. (2012). Django Unchained Is Manna for Mayhem Mavens.New York: New York Media, LLC.


https://imsdb.com/scripts/Django-Unchained.html


Jacobs, Christopher P. (2013) Film Theory and Approaches to Criticism, or WhatDid That Movie Mean?McCarty, T. (2012).


Kuhn,A. & Westwell, G. 2012, A Dictionary of Film Studies, Oxford University Press


Kozloff, S. 2000. Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press


Stein, Atara. 2009. The Byronic Hero in Film, Fiction, and Television. Paperback ed, Southern Illinois University Press.


Spolsky, B. (2004). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Institut d`etudes Theologiques